| Jc3s5h added a comment. |
I verified the dates for
In T105100#2659241, @Addshore wrote:@Jc3s5h This should be as simple as removing the instance of qualifier.
We of course have the lists of all statements that will be touched in this run of the script.
If we do ever do a future run we will still have that list of guids that we can avoid!
I notice you said lists of all statements touched. What if a statement is found to be incorrect and is corrected. For example, it is a Gregorian date and, after consulting the supporting source, it is changed to Julian. Can we be assured a future run will not then mark it as a suspicious Julian calendar date with day precision?
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Addshore, Jc3s5h
Cc: Ymblanter, Edgars2007, Multichill, joeroe, Esc3300, Candalua, Ricordisamoa, Jc3s5h, daniel, Tobi_WMDE_SW, Addshore, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, D3r1ck01, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
Cc: Ymblanter, Edgars2007, Multichill, joeroe, Esc3300, Candalua, Ricordisamoa, Jc3s5h, daniel, Tobi_WMDE_SW, Addshore, Aklapper, Lydia_Pintscher, D3r1ck01, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
