| Smalyshev added a comment. |
I think this idea makes a lot of sense. While I think all far-ago dates that have day precision are most probably data errors (you can't have May 4th in 200000BC, really, at least not using Earthly calendars :) handling these errors in more sane manner is good. However, I think we need then to change precision, if we operate under year precision, we can't just take year and then claim day precision. It'd be claiming false data.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: thiemowmde, Smalyshev
Cc: gerritbot, hoo, aude, Lydia_Pintscher, Jc3s5h, Smalyshev, Jonas, thiemowmde, Aklapper, mschwarzer, Avner, Lewizho99, Maathavan, debt, Gehel, D3r1ck01, FloNight, Xmlizer, Izno, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331
Cc: gerritbot, hoo, aude, Lydia_Pintscher, Jc3s5h, Smalyshev, Jonas, thiemowmde, Aklapper, mschwarzer, Avner, Lewizho99, Maathavan, debt, Gehel, D3r1ck01, FloNight, Xmlizer, Izno, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
