| Smalyshev added a comment. |
The queries are trivial, but the result sets are potentially very very large.
True, but also true for SPARQL queries. People do million-item queries right now. With LDF they at least get proper paging and not bring down the server while doing it, hopefully.
If I understand correctly, we'll be generating and caching each tripe in blazegraph multiple times
Not sure what you mean by this. The query result will of course be generated anew for each different query - this is true for any query. It also would be cached by varnish - this is also true for any query, and can be configured. Since query result is naturally paged, how much data is cached will depend on the query (just as in SPARQL case) and the client actually consuming the data. I imagine varnish is supposed to be able to handle such cases, but if not we can change caching parameters to make it easier for varnish.
Cc: Krinkle, faidon, dpatrick, daniel, gerritbot, Aklapper, Zppix, Smalyshev, Ramalepe, Liugev6, EBjune, mschwarzer, Avner, Lewizho99, Maathavan, debt, Gehel, D3r1ck01, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, Izno, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
