| daniel added a comment. |
In T136358#2825885, @Smalyshev wrote:Since query result is naturally paged, how much data is cached will depend on the query (just as in SPARQL case) and the client actually consuming the data.
I think we have different understandings of how the paging works. It would be good to have clarity on this.
As far as I understand, for a pattern like ( ? P31 Q5 ), the *entire* result set would be generated before paging applies, and all pages of the set would be cached preemptively. That's a lot of data to generate and store, especially since there will be a lot of such P31 datasets.
Maybe I'm wrong, and the query is run with a LIMIT and ORDER, and a continuation based on the the subject ID. That would of course be much better. Can you confirm that this is actually the case?
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: daniel
Cc: Micru, Krinkle, faidon, dpatrick, daniel, gerritbot, Aklapper, Zppix, Smalyshev, Ramalepe, Liugev6, EBjune, mschwarzer, Avner, Lewizho99, Maathavan, debt, Gehel, D3r1ck01, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, Izno, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331
Cc: Micru, Krinkle, faidon, dpatrick, daniel, gerritbot, Aklapper, Zppix, Smalyshev, Ramalepe, Liugev6, EBjune, mschwarzer, Avner, Lewizho99, Maathavan, debt, Gehel, D3r1ck01, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, Izno, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
