| daniel added a comment. |
@GWicke yes, indeed. This ticket is not about concept URIs, but about URIs for page content. Page content may be a description of a real world concept, or be otherwise related to such concepts. In order to express such a relation ship, both (the concept and the description) need canonical URIs. At least the URI for the description should be resolvable.
On the next level, we may want URIs/URLs for specific serializations/formats/projections as well as for for specific revisions. In my mind, RESTbase URLs are suitable for that. But for the "abstract" description URI (basically, page title level), RESTbase URLs expose too much technical detail for my taste.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: daniel
Cc: Rybesh, Dzahn, GWicke, tstarling, Aklapper, Jonas, Smalyshev, mkroetzsch, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, QZanden, D3r1ck01, Izno, suriyaa, Eevans, mobrovac, Hardikj, Wikidata-bugs, aude, jayvdb, Southparkfan, fbstj, RobLa-WMF, santhosh, Mbch331, Jay8g, Ltrlg, Glaisher, bd808, Krenair, Legoktm
Cc: Rybesh, Dzahn, GWicke, tstarling, Aklapper, Jonas, Smalyshev, mkroetzsch, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, QZanden, D3r1ck01, Izno, suriyaa, Eevans, mobrovac, Hardikj, Wikidata-bugs, aude, jayvdb, Southparkfan, fbstj, RobLa-WMF, santhosh, Mbch331, Jay8g, Ltrlg, Glaisher, bd808, Krenair, Legoktm
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
