| ChristianKl added a comment. |
I'm not sure that this will reduce the amount of errors.
Currently, the person who proposes the property sets the datatype. Afterwards, there are seven days where people can object to the proposal and the datatype that was selected. It takes at least one person to support the proposal the way it is. There's consensus for the datatype at the time it get's created.
This proposal is basically about making it easier to create properties that don't have the datatype on which there's community consensus. Sometimes this will mean that the property creator reflects about the property again and recognizes that the community consensus is bad. Other times this will mean that the creator doesn't correctly copy the agreed upon consensus.
What's your reasoning for believing that there will result in total in less errors? Especially given that it adds another manual action to the process.
Cc: ChristianKl, Micru, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, Sjoerddebruin, Bugreporter, thiemowmde, Jonas, Aklapper, Zppix, Jan_Dittrich, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, Lewizho99, Maathavan, SamanthaNguyen, JGirault, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
