| Yurik added a comment. |
@Aklapper I meant that a phab ticket is a much more convenient way to manage reminders and organize/plan/track work. The review of the code should happen in the code itself, which in this case is actually github (it has an excellent review system).
It is still not ideal, because we also want to auto-build it in jenkins - which means that not only should we track it in phab, we might also want to automate gerrit import and reporting mechanism. This is exactly what travis-ci does - it takes PR from github, runs it, and posts back the results of a test run.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Yurik
Cc: Izno, Smalyshev, Aklapper, Yurik, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, Avner, debt, SamanthaNguyen, Gehel, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, Luke081515, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331, Krenair, greg
Cc: Izno, Smalyshev, Aklapper, Yurik, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, Avner, debt, SamanthaNguyen, Gehel, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, Luke081515, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331, Krenair, greg
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
