| daniel added a comment. |
@cscott you said "I believe JSON-LD is just an alternate representation of the RDF data" - that's exactly the problem. That RDF would not be compatible with our manually defined RDF mapping. It would have a different semantic grounding. We would end up with two incompatible RDF models.
To avoid this, our JSON-LD would have to be based on our RDF binding, not our native JSON. So it would look very different from our native JSON (and would probably be much more complex).
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: daniel
Cc: cscott, Liuxinyu970226, intracer, Aklapper, AnjaJentzsch, Abraham, Denny, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
Cc: cscott, Liuxinyu970226, intracer, Aklapper, AnjaJentzsch, Abraham, Denny, Lydia_Pintscher, daniel, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
