| Jarekt added a comment. |
In T127929#3443235, @Ghouston wrote:Technically, I suspect this would be easiest if Wikidata was allowed to hold all the items that Commons needs to store information about.
That would mean allowing any user that ever uploaded his file to Commons to have an item on Wikidata. I do not think that would be a good idea as that is something Wikidata specifically prohibited.
In T127929#3421586, @Aleksey_WMDE wrote:There could be X### items of a new type (like User/Person/Author...) which could be restricted to only have a name and a set of URLs/URIs (wikidata item, user page, Flickr/Facebook/Twitter/... account) that can identify the "person" (no statements, labels or descriptions)
I like that, the X### items could live on Commons (or on Wikidata ), we can debate restrictions on such items latter, but they would store limited range of data and be restricted to metadata about people, like wikipedia users that do not meet notability restrictions of regular wikidata items.
I would argue for any new types of items like M### or X### to share property ids with regular Q### items, and not to create parallel systems of properties. Some properties might be only allowed for some types of items.
Cc: Aleksey_WMDE, Jarekt, Ayack, Ghouston, Charlie_WMDE, Izno, thiemowmde, Ladsgroup, Liuxinyu970226, Pigsonthewing, Bugreporter, Jan_Dittrich, Josve05a, Sadads, Poyekhali, gerritbot, DannyH, Micru, intracer, mkroetzsch, Aklapper, daniel, Steinsplitter, Lydia_Pintscher, SandraF_WMF, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, Acer, Wong128hk, Wikidata-bugs, Base, matthiasmullie, aude, El_Grafo, Ricordisamoa, Fabrice_Florin, Mbch331, Tgr
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
