| Smalyshev added a comment. |
Personally I am not convinced this is a good match for a graph database. This looks like something that is better as a generic API/database. But I am not sure I understand the use-case properly as of yet.
At this point, the only way to rank various Wikidata results is to order them by sitelink-count
Not sure what you mean here. Which results - do you mean SPARQL query results? Search results? In any case, you can rank them by several criteria, the question is what is the purpose of the ranking.
We also have the "popularity score" field in Elastic index which is already auto-updated afaik. That is used for ranking already.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Smalyshev
Cc: Esc3300, Lydia_Pintscher, Yair_rand, Smalyshev, Aklapper, Yurik, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, Avner, debt, Gehel, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, Izno, JAllemandou, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331, jeremyb
Cc: Esc3300, Lydia_Pintscher, Yair_rand, Smalyshev, Aklapper, Yurik, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, EBjune, merbst, Avner, debt, Gehel, Jonas, FloNight, Xmlizer, Izno, JAllemandou, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Tobias1984, Manybubbles, Mbch331, jeremyb
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
