Jheald added a comment.

That looks so great now. Thank you! (And @Shonagon ).

Any idea whether this is a problem that would be likely to recur, if the image-detail syntax was put into more high-volume use?

(ie can image detail use be treated as stable and reliable (or made so), without needing manual intervention?)


TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T89552

EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: Jheald
Cc: PokestarFan, Astinson, SandraF_WMF, Pyb, Spinster, Jane023, Puik, Wittylama, Shonagon, Jdforrester-WMF, Sumit, GAllegre, brion, Regisrob, Fae, Klokantech, Pietromarialiuzzo, Nemo_bis, Matanya, Marsupium, Husky, Jheald, Tgr, Bawolff, Gilles, dschwen, Aklapper, Multichill, E1presidente, Waytogoeducation, Ramsey-WMF, Jmmuguerza, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, srishakatux, Acer, V4switch, Pahadiahimanshu, Manrajsinghgrover, Keer25, Susannaanas, Izno, Wong128hk, Yann, Wikidata-bugs, PKM, Base, matthiasmullie, aude, Ricordisamoa, Fabrice_Florin, Raymond, Mbch331, Jay8g
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to