| Smalyshev added a comment. |
If I understand the use case right, you may not need the full data set, and you won't be actually importing the data into WDQS database. So you can change the RDF model according to your case.
For identifiers, right now they are non-portable and implementation-dependant (see T167759) - except for statement ones, which are just GUIDs. But again I think based on use case that you have, you can choose any consistent scheme (preferably which would return same ID for the same data) as you won't be mixing actual WDQS data and imported data directly.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Smalyshev
Cc: Pintoch, Aklapper, Hjfocs, Tpt, Lydia_Pintscher, Smalyshev, GoranSMilovanovic, Kiailandi, QZanden, dachary, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Ricordisamoa, Sjoerddebruin, Mbch331
Cc: Pintoch, Aklapper, Hjfocs, Tpt, Lydia_Pintscher, Smalyshev, GoranSMilovanovic, Kiailandi, QZanden, dachary, Izno, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Ricordisamoa, Sjoerddebruin, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
