| aaron added a comment. |
In T173696#3690945, @Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE wrote:Reopening. This task is supposed to be for caching results in general, which isn’t done yet at all, though we had a lot of discussion on caching regex checks specifically here, which in hindsight should’ve been in a separate task. Also, IMO the regex caching isn’t done yet, since the Grafana stats are pretty unsatisfactory.
(Perhaps we should repurpose this task to be just about regex checking, open a new one for general caching, and reshuffle the parent tasks so that this one is a child of the new task?)
The cache hit rate will be low if their is low traffic (as of now with a few people using a JS tool), since not much will get populated and items will expire. Something like increasing the cache set() rate as the last-modified time of the cache entry increases would work. It would also result in much more entries stored that might not get a lot of use though.
Cc: Krinkle, aaron, gerritbot, Ladsgroup, daniel, Aklapper, Jonas, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Agabi10, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
