| Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE added a comment. |
I don’t think the “best statement” interpretation makes sense for property constraints. Constraint statements don’t hold a list of values of the same kind, of which one is (in whatever way) determined to be the best; they define special characteristics of a property, which are mainly identified by the constraint type, and the fact that they’re all statements of a single “property constraint” property is mainly a technical detail of the encoding IMHO. I don’t see why it would make sense not to check a “single value” constraint just because there is a “format” constraint with preferred rank. And if you take constraint scope into account as well, I think this interpretation gets even stranger.
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE
Cc: thiemowmde, Lydia_Pintscher, gerritbot, Sjoerddebruin, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, Multichill, Adrian1985, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, LawExplorer, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Agabi10, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
Cc: thiemowmde, Lydia_Pintscher, gerritbot, Sjoerddebruin, Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE, Aklapper, Multichill, Adrian1985, Cpaulf30, Lahi, Gq86, Baloch007, Darkminds3113, Lordiis, GoranSMilovanovic, Adik2382, Th3d3v1ls, Ramalepe, Liugev6, QZanden, LawExplorer, Lewizho99, Maathavan, Agabi10, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs
