Dead tree references will be oh so totally allowed :) About archiving the digital ones: let's see. The Wikipedias in general do not solve this problem either, so it seems reasonable to assume that this is not a high requirement. Or, put other way: reliable sources seem to have rather stable URIs.
Archiving might still be interesting, but you mentioned a bunch of problems with this already. Cheers, Denny 2012/4/2 Scott Beardsley <[email protected]> > On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 2:27 PM, emijrp <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dead trees references are allowed today at Wikipedia. Why not at > Wikidata? > > Thanks, I wasn't sure of the policy for wikipedia. I hope this > continues on into wikidata. > > > I mean archiving all the digital references. > > Jeblad's suggestion to store (and potentially republish) the important > fragment sounds reasonable (IANAL though). I wonder if the folks at > archive.org might have some suggestions since they seem to have blazed > a trail in this space. > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > -- Project director Wikidata Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Eisenacher Straße 2 | 10777 Berlin Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 | http://wikimedia.de Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
