Hoi,
First things first ... that is getting Wikidata to work for its initial
purposes. Automated updates from elsewhere are nice but introduce a
complete new set of issues including reliability.
Thanks,
Gerard
On 9 April 2012 03:25, JFC Morfin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there an objection to the concept of, or cooperation with, "datawiki"
> Wikidata compatible projects? I would define a "datawiki" (as there are
> databases) as a JSON oriented NoSQL DBMS using an enhanced wiki as a human
> user I/O interface. This would permit BigData, specialized data, and graph
> sources to feed Wikidata along their own data philosophy and
> collection/update policy. I suppose that the main point would be an
> inter-datawiki interchange protocol (RFC?) matching the datawiki
> authoritative operators' (the first of them being Wikidata) requirements. I
> would permit projects at different stages of R&D or with different main
> purposes in order to cooperate with Wikidata.
> jfc
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
