OCLC-Wikidata sounds very interesting.

I wonder whether the Wikidata people have thought about notability, and if/when there is much lower notability criteria the amount of data that could potentially be stored in Wikidata.

In Wikipedia we do not have individual articles on scientific articles. (I "complained" about this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Finn_%C3%85rup_Nielsen_-_Wikipedia_is_not_the_sum_of_all_human_knowledge_-_Wikimania_2010.pdf :-)

AFAIR my library have over 100 million records of journal articles. These could potentially go into the Wikidata together with information extracted from the scientific paper (In my case that would be data related to brain activity).


/Finn, http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~fn/

On 25-05-2012 01:41, Klein,Max wrote:
Hello Wikidata Wizards,

Phoebe Ayers from the Board recommended I talk to you. My name is Max
Klein and I am the Wikipedian in Residence for OCLC. OCLC owns
Worldcat.org the world’s largest holder of Library data at 264 million
bibliographic records about books, journals and other library items. We
would really like to partner with you as Wikidata is being built, in
incorporating our data into your project.

*What we can offer:*

·WorldCat.org metadata http://www.worldcat.org/ .

oTypically, for any work we have most of the following: title, authors,
publisher, formats, summaries, editions, subjects, languages, intended
audience, all associated ISBNs, length, and abstract.

·APIs to this data http://oclc.org/developer/

oAnd some other cool APIs like xISBN which returns all the ISBNs of all
the editions of book on the input of any single one.

·Library finding tools

oWhen viewing a record on our site, we show you the closest library
which has that work, and links to reserve it for pick-up.

·The Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) http://viaf.org/, which
is an Authoritative Disambiguation file

oThat means that we have certified data on disambiguation of Authors

·WorldCat Identities, an Analytics site http://www.worldcat.org/identities/

oIt gives you for Author metadata and analytics: Alternative names,
significant dates, publication timelines, genres, roles, related
authors, and tag clouds of associated subjects.

*What’s in it for us:*

·We are a not-for-profit member cooperative. Our mission is “Connecting
people to knowledge through library cooperation.”

·Since I work at the research group, for now this is just a research
project.

oIf at some point this goes live - and you want to - we’d like to
integrate the “find it at a library near me” feature, that means
click-throughs for us.

*The ideas:*

There are a lot of possibilities, and I’d like to hear your input. These
are the first few that I’ve can come up with.

·Making infoboxes for each book or author that contains all their metadata.

oReady to incorporate into all language projects.

·Using authority files to disambiguate or link works to their creators.

oSolving DABs

·Using our analytics (e.g. author timelines) as Wikidata data types to
transclude.

oCurating articles with easy to include dynamic analytics

·Populating or creating works/author pages with their
algorithmically-derived history and details.

oExtremely experimental semantic work.

I’m roaring and ready to get this collaboration going. I know Wikidata
is at an early stage, and we are willing to accommodate you.

Send me any feedback or ideas,

Max Klein

Wikipedia in Residence

kle...@oclc.org

+17074787023



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to