On 29-05-2012 09:08, Klein,Max wrote:
From: emijrp<[email protected]>
>
2012/5/25 Lydia Pintscher<[email protected]>
A decision hasn't been made. We're looking at cc-0 for the beginning
for the data but the community might decide to change this later.
I think that CC-0 is a good choice.
The answer is that WorldCat is published under Open Data Commons,
Attribution (ODC-BY).
For more information http://opendatacommons.org/category/odc-by/ .
I know CC0 is tempting choice, but I hope a choice is made that can
accommodate willing partners.
Max Klein
[email protected]
For Wikimedia related projects I think that the share-alike ODC-ODbL is
a good choice. :-)
It is a question whether the CC-licenses can be used to any major extent
when the individual data items are mere facts.
I wonder how you manage to attribute the data sources in aggregation
databases. You might need extra fields: 'source database' and 'license'.
I suppose that is not in the Wikidata proposal? For Wikipedia you often
use a template to indicate source databases where attribution is required.
Finn Årup Nielsen
http://www.imm.dtu.dk/~fn/
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
