Should there be a clear license right from the beginning to avoid what happened to openstreetmap, which recently deleted data where they were unable to switch the license over to odbl?
Rupert Am 02.08.2012 12:12 schrieb "Thomas Douillard" <[email protected]>: > > > 2012/8/2 Jan Kučera <[email protected]> > >> Hi there, >> >> did anyone think of possible copyright restrictions on the use of >> external data within wikidata? I am not sure common public sources of >> data are usable right away... seems like copyright works the same with >> data as with any other "work"... Sure, many organizations throw data >> into public domain, but it definitely is not an industry standard yet. >> >> Kozuch >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >> > > Hi. There is indeed laws that applys to data IF they are compiled, in my > understanding - nobody can copyright the geolocalisation of the Eiffel > tower alone for example, that would be absurd. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_right > > In my understanding there would be a problem if somebody imports data > massively from a protected database. Owners sometimes inserts false data in > their datasets to be able to prove that an illegal copy has been made. But > the "in beetween" single data and mass import is quite unclear to me :) > > On the other hand there are licences such as > http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Data > > TomT0m > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
