John McClure wrote:
"To my knowledge ISO has not published, nor is intending to publish, instances 
of topic maps representing the content of their numerous publications, using 
either their (ISO's) standard for Topic Maps (ISO/IEC 13250), or any other ISO 
or non-ISO standard. Forgive me if I ever gave that impression.

You provided a nice link to unofficial topic map standards, thank you. Here's 
others: http://www.garshol.priv.no/download/tmlinks.html.";


thanks for the link. Why is the topic map standard at 
http://www.topicmaps.org/standards/ an unofficial topic map standard?
They talk about that it is  ISO 13250 standard.

You had drawn my attention to the ISO, thanks for that however the impression 
that they might have some standards is from their
website: 
http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=50772

where they write amongst others:
"The primary purpose of ISO/IEC 19788 is to specify metadata elements and their 
attributes for the description of learning resources. This includes the rules 
governing the identification of data elements and the specification of their 
attributes."

since this thing costs 162 CHF i can't check what those guys are really doing 
there, however it would be strange to define
metadata which is not for automated processing. In particular they write a 
little later:

"ISO/IEC 19788-1:2011 is information-technology-neutral and defines a set of 
common approaches, i.e. methodologies and constructs, which apply to the 
development of the subsequent parts of ISO/IEC 19788."

would they write this if ISO/IEC 19788 was information-technology-neutral as 
well?



moreover there exists also a
 N2448 Summary of voting on ISOIEC NP 18343, Learning environment profile for 
automated contents  


which is password protected at the webpage: 
http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/open/jtc1sc36
but where the word AUTOMATED appears explicitly.

but of course it would be nicer to have someone who knows explicitly what 
exactly they are having in mind there at ISO.

_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to