Hi Gregor - the root of the misconception I likely have about significant digits and the like, is that such is one example of a rendering parameter not a semantic property. But maybe I've missed the part of the discussion that cleanly separates these things into buckets, and perhaps I have my head way too (deep in the sand) to understand the discussion altogether, but that's my two cents fwiw.
With regard to other relevant worthy efforts, I suggest http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/. [3] On 19.12.2012 09:47, Gregor Hagedorn wrote: > Martynas, > > I think you misinterpret the thread. There is no discussion not to > build on the datatypes defined in http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ [1] > > What we are doing is discussing compositions of elements, all typed to > xml datatypes, that shall be able to express scientific and > engineering requirements as to statistics, signficant digits (except > perhaps for duration, none of the data types in > http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ [1] supports that), as well as means to > express uncertainty and confidence intervals. > > Many existing xml schemata define such compositions, all squarely > built on http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ [1] - wikidata is certainly not > unique in this effort. If you can point the team to further well > reviewed solutions, this would be very useful. > > Gregor > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l [2] Links: ------ [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/ [2] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list Wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
