Oops. As of yesterday a template does exist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wikidata
From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:49:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] The experience for (local project) editors, post-Phase 2 We'll probably also want a template for Wikidata like the one for Wikiquote, etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Wikiquote I can go ahead and make it if it doesn't already exist somewhere that I haven't found. From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 15:36:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] The experience for (local project) editors, post-Phase 2 I wrote on the wikEd developer's talk page and said I could help out if needed. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Cacycle/wikEd#Inline_links_to_Wikidata_itemsThat still wouldn't help first time editors that come across the syntax unexpectedly though. We should make sure it is described on the help page you can get to from the article editing page. From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:54:40 -0400 Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] The experience for (local project) editors, post-Phase 2 I didn't know about the VisualEditor initiative, but I use the wikEd gadget that you can enable under your preferences for the English Wikipedia. It makes links to images clickable while editing, among other things. If we could get a similar experience to link to a Wikidata item that could be a good first step. > Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 19:51:43 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] The experience for (local project) editors, > post-Phase 2 > > Steven Walling, 29/03/2013 19:39: > > The thread is at: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#Wikidata_phase_2_is_coming_soon > > Doesn't seem to be en.wiki-related, so I'll reply here: "normal users" > are not able to edit infoboxes anyway, so Wikidata is the first step to > make infobox data more easily editable: we're already seeing this with > interwiki links (except for Commons, whose situation worsened because > it's outside the circle). > There was a time when we thought Semantic MediaWiki with its forms (or > other hacky forms) were the way, but probably Wikidata will be serving > this purpose too. > > Nemo > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
