Meh. The oversight right in general is pointless, just a legal separation that for some reason can't be handled by admins. Oh well, I don't make the rules, and if people really want more flags we might as well let them ask. At least we aren't replacing the 40+ stewards with just two ovs, and have a whopping seven candidates. I'm not sure what to think of that, actually... Especially since that's more than past os requests done on Wikidata.
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Vito <[email protected]> wrote: > Il 23/04/2013 21:28, Adrian Raddatz ha scritto: > > I completely agree, and don't know why there is such a move towards >> localizing oversight (and I imagine checkuser will come next). It should >> be noted that stewards can still oversight as part of cross-wiki work that >> they are doing, per the voted-upon policy. >> >> Maybe I'm a bit biased since I'm a stewie but frankly I don't see so > much need for local oversighters, local checkusers might be ok (but > actually I saw only crosswiki issues needing a check on wikidata) but ovs > are imho pointless. > > > > Vito > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l> > -- Adrian Raddatz, R.C.N. Naval Cadet Royal Military College Saint-Jean Government of Canada
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
