Yes that was one of the issues raised in this paper: "There is no money in Linked Data" Prateek Jain, Pascal Hitzler, Krzysztof Janowicz, Chitra Venkatramani => http://knoesis.wright.edu/pascal/pub/nomoneylod.pdf
-Nicolas. On 6/17/13 3:08 PM, "Barry Norton" <[email protected]> wrote: > >One can't license something for which one does/can not have the copyright. > >Barry > > >On 17/06/13 23:03, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: >> Tom Morris, 15/06/2013 14:11: >>> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 3:52 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) >>> wrote: >>> >>> For a closer integration with MusicBrainz, they'd probably have to >>> change their (non)licenses. >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/__wiki/MusicBrainz#Licensing >>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MusicBrainz#Licensing>> (They seem to >>> claim they're free content, but they aren't.) >>> >>> >>> The core MusicBrainz facts (artists, albums, tracks) are in the >>>public >>> domain. It's the extra stuff like user generated comments, ratings, >>>etc >>> that they license. >> >> Yes, but their licensing scheme is not very clear and PD is not a >> license. >> >> Nemo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > > >_______________________________________________ >Wikidata-l mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
