Yes, I have two options, I can just skip them or I can mark them in another
color like pink or something else.

What do you think? and what color if you recommend the latter.

Best


On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Magnus Manske <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks for this.
>
> You might want to filter it, though: For example
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q85256 states "born in 1606" (no month or
> day given), but your report at
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2/26 gives
> it as 1606-01-01, which then conflicts with the date given in Wikipedias
> (1606-03-18).
>
> Wikidata is less precise than Wikipedia here, but not actually wrong.
> Maybe these cases should be treated separately from the potential errors.
>
> Cheers,
> Magnus
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Amir Ladsgroup <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I started this report, you can find it here
>> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Birth_date_report2>.
>>
>> Best
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Amir Ladsgroup <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> It's possible and rather easy to add them  .just several regexes and
>>> list of months in that language are needed. but the issue is no major wikis
>>> except these three are using a person data template (Almost all of them
>>> have the template but almost none of them are using it widely) If any other
>>> wiki is using a person data template widely, I would be happy to implement
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Best
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Amir E. Aharoni <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can we join more Wikipedias to the comparison?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
>>>> http://aharoni.wordpress.com
>>>> ‪“We're living in pieces,
>>>> I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2014-08-19 10:38 GMT+03:00 Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>>>  Hoi,
>>>>> Amir has created functionality that compares data from en.wp de.wp and
>>>>> it.wp. It is data about "humans" and it only shows differences where
>>>>> they
>>>>> exist. It compares those four Wikipedias with information in Wikidata.
>>>>>
>>>>> The idea is that the report will be updated regularly.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem we face is: what should it actually look like. Should it
>>>>> just
>>>>> splatter the info on a page or is more needed. At this time we just
>>>>> have
>>>>> data [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> Please help us with something that works easily for now. Once we have
>>>>> something, it can be prettified and more functional.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>      GerardM
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://paste.ubuntu.com/8079742/
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wikimedia-l mailing list, guidelines at:
>>>>> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/Guidelines
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mailing_lists/[email protected]>
>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l,
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Amir
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Amir
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata-l mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-tech mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
>
>


-- 
Amir
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to