Am 23.10.2014 16:42, schrieb Lydia Pintscher: > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 2:36 PM, David Cuenca <[email protected]> wrote: >> There are major problems using redirects as sitelinks. The top one is that >> they do not always point to the concept they should, and even if they do, >> there is no guarantee that this redirect will keep pointing to the same >> place (normally to a section of another article), since the section title >> can change. >> >> Wikipedia supports section labelling: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Labeled_section_transclusion >> >> It would be nice if someone from wd-dev could take a look and see if this >> could be the basis to link items with a stable section identifier in a WP >> article. Or if that is not possible or far from ideal, then see what other >> approaches are available. > > Right now I am not sure how we'd be doing that in a usable and > non-intrusive way but please do keep brainstorming.
Making pages that just transclude part of another page strikes me as odd (generally, you compose a big page from small snippets, not the other way around). As a solution to the "ambiguous sitelink" issue, I'd rather see us allowing sitelinks to redirects directly than forcing people to use a hack like this. Note that currently, we can't just do this without breaking some assumptions/expectations. We'll need to hink hard about how to get this right. But section transcusion doesn't strike me as a good way to go about this. -- daniel -- Daniel Kinzler Senior Software Developer Wikimedia Deutschland Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. _______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
