Maybe not really a correct answer to your question, but I'm thiking of something similar of automated generated articles.
In my suggestion this was, associate a template description, in form of a wikitemplate that uses claims, to a query. 2015-02-09 11:58 GMT+01:00 Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]>: > @Gerard, @Magnus: please help me out here. > > I agree that automatic descriptions are very useful. I also think that in > *some* > cases, manual descriptions are more useful, and maybe even needed. > > I definitely think that 3rd party consumers of wikidata should not have to > think > about whether descriptions have been written manually or were created > automatically. This should be completely transparent. > > So, if you want to help with making automated description a reality, > please make > suggestions that take into account the above points, and also consider the > mechanisms for language fallback. > > The only thing that I can think of right away is simply inserting automated > descriptions by bot. This isn't ideal, but I can't think of a better > solution > that wouldn't be hugely complicated (and would thus not be implemented any > time > soon). Maybe you have ideas? > > -- daniel > > > Am 09.02.2015 um 11:41 schrieb Magnus Manske: > > Manual descriptions are, in the vast majority of cases, a waste of > volunteer > > time. Alternative: > > http://magnusmanske.de/wordpress/?p=265 > > > > On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 17:37:42 Gerard Meijssen < > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Hoi, > > How does that help ? The point is exactly that there is no point to > > descriptions. Why iterate on a dog it will still be a mutt. > > Thanks, > > GerardM > > > > On 8 February 2015 at 14:07, Amir E. Aharoni < > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > I'd rather see it not as something terribly disappointing, but > as an > > opportunity to find a way to fill item descriptions more > efficiently. > > > > Basically, to find some cycles to resolve > > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T64695 > > > > בתאריך 8 בפבר 2015 10:33, "Gerard Meijssen" < > [email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> כתב: > > > > Hoi, > > I understand that item descriptions are going to be used in > a mobile > > app. In my opinion that is seriously disappointing because > it is not > > realistic to expect enough coverage in any language. > Particularly in > > the small languages it will not be really useful. > > > > My question is: we have had automated descriptions for a > long time. > > What is it that they makes that they are not used.? > > > > Thanks, > > GerardM > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikidata-l mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikidata-l mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > > > > > > _________________________________________________ > > Wikidata-l mailing list > > [email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]> > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/__mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > > <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikidata-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l > > > > > -- > Daniel Kinzler > Senior Software Developer > > Wikimedia Deutschland > Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
