> The other is to extend the link syntax similar to image syntax, for
example
> with  [[Article Name|Alternate Text|wd=Q1234]]. This should be minimally
disruptive
> to the editors.

Yes - this would be more or less perfect, but it would require changes in
core MediaWiki. If nothing else works, then it's possible, but seems harder
to get through in practice.


--
Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי
http://aharoni.wordpress.com
‪“We're living in pieces,
I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore‬

2015-02-12 12:20 GMT+02:00 Smolenski Nikola <[email protected]>:

> Citiranje "Amir E. Aharoni" <[email protected]>:
> > TL;DR: How can a red link be annotated in a semantic way with a foreign
> > article title or a Wikidata Q item number?
> >
> > Imagine: I'm writing a Wikipedia article in Russian. There's a red link
> in
> > it. I don't have time to write the target article for that link now, but
> > I'm sure that it should exist. In fact, that article does exist in the
> > English Wikipedia.
> >
> > I want the link to be red (fr the usual wiki reasons), but until the
> > Russian article is written, I want to give the software a hint about
> which
> > topic it is supposed to be about. Telling it the English article name
> would
> > be one way to do it. Giving it the Wikidata Q item number would be an
> even
> > better way to do it.
> >
> > Unfortunately, MediaWiki does not currently have true syntax to do
> either.
> > (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
> >
> > Some Wikipedias may have templates that do something like this (e.g.
> > Russian: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:En ). But there's
> nothing
> > that is uniform to all projects.
> >
> > *Why* is it useful to give the software this hint in the first place?
> Most
> > simplistically, it's useful to the reader - in case that reader knows
> > English, she can at least read something.
> >
> > But there's something bigger. When the ContentTranslation extension
> > translates links, it automatically adapts links that can be found. What
> to
> > do about those that can't be auto-adapted? It frequently happens when
> > Wikipedians translate articles that many links in the created articles
> turn
> > out to be red. We'd love to get ContentTranslation to help the
> translators
> > make those articles by writing relevant articles with as few clicks as
> > possible, and that is only possible by annotating the red links with the
> > topics to which they belong.
> >
> > So, any ideas?
> > What do other Wikipedias for such annotation?
> > Is it imaginable to add wiki syntax for such a thing?
> > Can anybody think of a hack that reuses the current [[link]] syntax to
> add
> > such annotation?
>
> One possibility would be to allow creation of links to nonexisting
> articles on
> Wikidata, perhaps by using a new "nonexisting article" badge. Of course,
> this
> could lead to various problems on its own,
>
> The other is to extend the link syntax similar to image syntax, for example
> with
> [[Article Name|Alternate Text|wd=Q1234]]. This should be minimally
> disruptive
> to
> the editors.
>
> Either one of these solutions would be useful for automated article
> creation,
> and other purposes, for example finding multiple unwritten articles with
> the
> same name about different topics, or finding erroneous links in Wikidata.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l

Reply via email to