Hey, I agree with Daniel Werners last post, though it looks like it has 2 typos in it. Will highlight them to avoid confusion:
> Just having the data value, taking its *data type* and using a standard formatter for that data value type would be sufficient "data type" should just be "type". > With your approach, we would take this *flexibility*. That's what I've been afraid of in the first place. "flexibility" probably should be something else. Cheers -- Jeroen De Dauw http://www.bn2vs.com Don't panic. Don't be evil. ~=[,,_,,]:3 --
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-tech mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech
