Indeed the ultimate truth source is on the wikidata site it self. However,
I am not aware of a way to query the Wikidata site for a list of items
fitting a certain condition (e.g. all Wikidata items containing a claim
with the  NCBI Entrez Gene (P351) property.)

It is here that I need to rely on WDQ (and WDQS) and potentially risk
missing existing items due to delays in which WDQ (and WDAS) gets updated.

I would like to know if I could rely on a given time frame - being it
seconds, hours,  days, or one week).

I currently assume a delay of a week, but I don't know how accurate this
assumption is.

Regards,



On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Stas Malyshev <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > The way that updates work *in all systems* (polling small lists of
> > recent changes at intervals and hoping that this leads to a complete
> > change history), it seems quite possible that such systems will
> > sometimes miss an update, at least in the long run and under varying
> > conditions (high server load, network troubles, update script down for a
> > while, whatever). Insufficient update frequency is maybe not the biggest
> > problem here (it should be in the range of one to a few minutes for all
> > of the services).
>
> Very important point with which I agree - it is completely possible that
> update polling misses an update, WDQS is no exception and it usually
> does not treat it as a problem, as the next update can fill up the
> missed one. However the ultimate truth source is on the wikidata site
> only. Beware of the caches though - if you ask for the same data on the
> same URL twice, I think you can get the same result even if the
> underlying data changed in the meantime.
>
> --
> Stas Malyshev
> [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to