There also seems to be an issue where a year could be recorded as either time="+0000000YYYY-00-00T00:00:00Z" or time="+0000000YYYY-01-01T00:00:00Z" (with precision=9). At least I spotted that my earlier bot runs was doing this.
These display the same but if you compare the claims they show up as different. I also guess only the latter is correct. Is there a way of checking how many of the first there is and possible convert these to the latter? André Costa | GLAM-tekniker, Wikimedia Sverige | [email protected] | +46 (0)733-964574 Stöd fri kunskap, bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige. Läs mer på blimedlem.wikimedia.se On 2 July 2015 at 20:48, Pierpaolo Bernardi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Neil Harris <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On 01/07/15 15:00, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote: > >> > > Just for future reference, if anyone's interested, THE book on this > topic is > > "Calendrical Calculations". > > > > Alas, their code is closed-source, but the book is still the best > reference > > I know of. > > True. HOWEVER, the authors of the book are the same people who wrote > the Emacs calendar, which is substantially the same code as the one in > the book, and the code in Emacs is GPL, of course. One can look at > the book for explanations, and at Emacs calendar for code, if one > needs free code. > > Cheers > P. > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
