2015-07-13 15:24 GMT+02:00 Daniel Kinzler <[email protected]>: > Am 13.07.2015 um 13:00 schrieb Ricordisamoa: >> I agree too. >> Also note that property IDs are language-neutral, unlike english names of >> templates, magic words, etc. > > As I said: if there is broad conseus to only use P-numbers to refer to > properties, fine with me (note however that Lydia disagrees, and it's her > decision). I like the idea of having the option of accessing properties via > localized names, but if there is no demand for this possibility, and it's a > pain > to implement, I won't complain about dropping support for that. > > But *if* we allow access to properties via localized unique labels (as we > currently do), then we really *should* allow the same via unique aliases, so > property labels can be chanegd without breaking stuff.
Providing this possibility IMHO is a good thing. If it is possible to allow this kind of access to data without generating the End of the Universe, I'm all for it. Then it *will* be difficult to deal with all the problems, but I don't think this is a good reason NOT to try to implement it. -- Luca "Sannita" Martinelli http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utente:Sannita _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
