Hoi,
The main point I get is that DBpedia is used and usable
If anything all the rest are things where Wikidata has its problems in
equal measure. As I read it, Wikidata has a bigger community with some
people doing a lot of muddling with the most wonderful subclasses and
hierarchy that are often unknown by others and happily ignored.Come to
think of it, When the data quality is compared, I doubt Wikidata will be so
great because there is so much just not there..
Thanks,
GerardM
On 31 July 2015 at 22:59, Markus Kroetzsch <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Vladimir Alexiev has published an interesting post on issues he
> encountered when using DBpedia at OntoText, drawing many comparisons to
> Wikidata [1]. While this post praises the practices of Wikidata in several
> places, I think there are a few important insights for Wikidata there as
> well. There are certainly points where Wikidata is running into similar
> issues (if you have had a look at our class hierarchy recently, you know
> what I mean). Even in the cases where we are doing good, it might be
> valuable to obtain some feedback and reconfirmation from another
> perspective.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Markus
>
> [1]
> http://vladimiralexiev.github.io/pres/20150209-dbpedia/dbpedia-problems-long.html
>
> --
> Markus Kroetzsch
> Faculty of Computer Science
> Technische Universität Dresden
> +49 351 463 38486
> http://korrekt.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
