Yes I got the gist of that hint and am still thinking about it. I am still not sure, but probably yes. It's the same reasoning as for the WLM unique identifiers btw. I am leaning towards at least one set of identifiers per country. We can think of these heritage sites after all as objects in the collection of "living history museums"
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Sandra Fauconnier < [email protected]> wrote: > As I hinted on project chat: if we create a property for MoMA IDs, we > really have to be consistent and create property for all art collections > that use persistent IDs and of which we have items on Wikidata. > I think we (will) have hundreds of these. > Are we OK with that - having hundreds of museum and art > collection-specific properties? > > Best, Sandra > > On 30 Jul 2015, at 17:44, Gerard Meijssen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hoi, > Good job ... went there to approve ... but as there is nothing to approve > I do. > Thanks, > GerardM > > On 30 July 2015 at 16:27, Andy Mabbett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 30 July 2015 at 14:52, Magnus Manske <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Everyone vote for MoMA property creation please ;-) >> > >> > >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Authority_control#MoMA_artwork >> >> I took the liberty of speedily creating that - P2014 >> >> -- >> Andy Mabbett >> @pigsonthewing >> http://pigsonthewing.org.uk >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
