Hey Tom, Thanks for you review. Note that this list list of *possible* errors and it doesn't mean all of entries are wrong :) (if it was like this, I would go ahead and removed them all)
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 1:22 AM Tom Morris <[email protected]> wrote: > After glancing at > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Kian/Possible_mistakes/frFilm, > it doesn't appear to me that either Wikidata type hierarchy or Wikipedia > category hierarchy is being considered when evaluating type mismatches. Is > that intentional? > > Not yet, it can be done with some programming hassle. If people like the reports and they are willing to work on them I promise to take that into account. > For example > > Grave of the Fireflies (Q274520) <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q274520>NoYes > (0.731427666987) > > > is an instance of animated film which is a subtype of film. > > Conversely, this telefilm d'horreur > > Le Collectionneur de cerveaux (Q579355) > <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q579355>YesNo (0.239868037957 > > is part of a subcategory of film d'horreur -> film de fiction > > The one other that I glanced at, > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Kian/Possible_mistakes/frHuman, > seems to have systematic issues with correct classification of Wikipedia > pages about multiple people (e.g. brothers) which Wikidata correctly > identifies as not people. > It can be considered as mis-classifications in articles in Wikipedia. even though I'm not a big fan of this idea. It seems these articles in Wikipedia lack of proper categories like siblings and duo-related categories and if those categories were there Kian would know. > > It also, strangely, seems to think that Wikidata atomic elements are > humans and I can't see why: > > calcium (Q706) <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q706>YesNo (0.0225392419603) > > That's a bug in autolist, I don't know why autolist included Q706 in humans. Maybe Magnus can tell. I need to dig deeper > Have you considered using other signals as inputs to your models? For > example, Freebase types should be a pretty reliable signal for things like > humans and films. > > No, but I think and investigate using them :) > Tom > > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Amir Ladsgroup <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks Nemo! >> >> I added new reports: >> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Ladsgroup/Kian/Possible_mistakes >> >> If you check them, you can easily find tons of errors, some of them are >> mis-categorization in Wikipedia, some of them are mistake in connecting >> article from Wikipedia to wrong item, some of them are vandalism in >> Wikidata, some of them are mistakes by bots or Widar users. Please check >> them if you want to have better quality in Wikidata >> >> Best >> >> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 12:16 PM Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Amir Ladsgroup, 28/08/2015 20:17: >>> > >>> > Another thing I did is reporting possible mistakes, when Wikipedia and >>> > Wikidata don't agree on one statement, >>> >>> Nice, with this Wikidata has better quality control systems than >>> Wikipedia. ;-) >>> >>> Nemo >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Wikidata mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wikidata mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
