Hi!

> A small fix though: I think you should better use count(?statement)
> rather than count(?ref), right?

Yes, of course, my mistake - I modified it from different query and
forgot to change it.

> I have tried a similar query on the public test endpoint on labs
> earlier, but it timed out for me (I was using a very common reference
> though ;-). For rarer references, live queries are definitely the better
> approach.

Works for me for Q216047, didn't check others though. For a popular
references, labs one may be too slow, indeed. A faster one is coming
"real soon now" :)

-- 
Stas Malyshev
smalys...@wikimedia.org

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to