It seems that the bot only wanted to sync statements, so the claim is on both 
items instead of one. You've only removed the statements at one side, so 
another bot could do the same again and add the statements back.

Sjoerddebruin

> Op 27 sep. 2015, om 21:02 heeft Thad Guidry <[email protected]> het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> I didn't revert a bot.  I removed a few erroneous statements that a bot made 
> incorrectly.
> 
> 
> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> 
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Vi to <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Actually you didn't talk about it, but still you can ask him for 
> explanations. Generally reverting a bot which is working fine (since the 
> mistake, if any, is onwiki) is useless.
> 
> Vito
> 
> 2015-09-27 20:11 GMT+02:00 Thad Guidry <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> Great.
> 
> ValterVB doesn't think I am right in removing them and has reverted them.
> 
> I think I now remember why I left Wikipedia... too many chiefs who think they 
> know better, rather than talking through things as a community.
> 
> 
> 
> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> 
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Thad Guidry <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> sorry, that should have been ... does NOT even help make them closer to any 
> sister city.
> 
> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> 
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Thad Guidry <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> ​I live there sometimes. :)
> 
> Partner City (an alias of that Sister City description) does even help make 
> them closer to any sister city.
> 
> If anyone disagrees with me, then you would have to fully describe what the 
> property Sister City really means...because there is little to go on other 
> than the idea of a "twin city". ​
> 
> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> 
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Vi to <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> From a technical point of view there's nothing wrong with those statemets.
> 
> Original infos were added by 
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/ILoveKorea 
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/ILoveKorea> which 
> doesn't seem to be a vandal. How did you find they are wrong?
> 
> 
> Vito
> 
> 2015-09-27 18:57 GMT+02:00 Amir Ladsgroup <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> Italian Wikipedia says it's correct: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hefei 
> <https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hefei>
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 8:21 PM Thad Guidry <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> OK, it seems that Wikipedia does have a few nice features. :)
> 
> I was able to quickly search History on the entity and find that Dexbot had 
> imported the erroneous statements https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Dexbot 
> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Dexbot>  <-- pretty cool options there, 
> Good Job whomever !
> 
> and let the User (owner of the bot) know of the problem.  
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:Ladsgroup 
> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:Ladsgroup>
> 
> 
> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> 
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Thad Guidry <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I had to clean up this entity that had Sister City property filled in with 
> lots of erroneous statements for it that I removed.
> 
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q185684 <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q185684>
> 
> How can I figure out where the import went wrong, how it happened, and how to 
> ensure it doesn't happen again ?  How does one look at Wikidata bots and 
> their efficiency or incorrectness ?
> 
> Trying to learn more,
> 
> Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata 
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata 
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata 
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata 
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata 
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to