If you want to use any data source in your program/tool, you first need
to look into the data and see how things are specified. You will soon
get an idea which qualifiers/properties are used to describe certain
circumstances. Much more important in my opinion is that we do this
consistently for all facts in some area so that we don't end up using
two different qualifiers to describe the same fact on different statements.
Best regards
Bene
Am 28.09.2015 um 16:14 schrieb Peter F. Patel-Schneider:
On 09/28/2015 04:31 AM, Luca Martinelli wrote:
2015-09-28 11:16 GMT+02:00 Markus Krötzsch <mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org>:
If this is the case, then maybe it
should just be kept as an intentionally broad property that captures what we
now find in the Wikipedias.
+1, the more broad the application of certain property is, the better.
We really don't need to be 100% specific with a property, if we can
exploit qualifiers.
L.
I worry about this way of specializing properties. How are people, and
particularly programs, going to be able to find out that a qualifier is
needed, which qualifier it is, and how it is to be used, or which broad
property is to be used for a specific purpose?
peter
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
