Sorry, I should have been clearer that I was talking about *external*
identifiers, not Wikidata identifiers/items.

For example, the three MusicBrainz IDs listed here:

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q78517#revision=254297158

Is that allowed?  Encouraged?  I'm hoping that the answer is yes to both.

Tom

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Addshore <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On 30 September 2015 at 20:58, Tom Morris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think I've seen something somewhere saying that the prevailing
>> sentiment is that obsolete identifiers which are just redirects to a new
>> identifier should be removed.
>>
>
> I hope not. See my post at
> http://addshore.com/2015/04/redirects-on-wikidata/ Redirects should
> remain!
>
> Also see http://addshore.com/2015/09/un-deleting-500000-wikidata-items/
>
>
>>
>> There's also the case of sites like MusicBrainz which keep the
>> non-canonical IDs without redirecting to the canonical ID, but will tell
>> you which ID is preferred, e.g. Fritz Kreisler
>> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q78517#revision=254297158>
>>
>> https://musicbrainz.org/artist/590fcad4-2ba4-43bc-a22f-a4bb9b496fe8
>> https://musicbrainz.org/artist/627ac6c2-ee5c-4120-8af3-ab00345447f5
>> https://musicbrainz.org/artist/bf6d6ce1-ce88-40e6-9424-11d11d2e54ea
>>
>> where all the tabs for the second two pages actually point to the first,
>> canonical entry.
>>
>> Is there an established policy for either the redirect or non-redirect
>> case?
>>
>
> See
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Deletion_policy#Deletion_of_items_.28Phase_I.29
> which says "Items should not be deleted when - The item redirects to
> another item"
>
> Also see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Help:Merge#Create_redirect which
> says redirects should be created when items are merged
>
>
>>
>> I'd argue that even the obsolete identifiers are useful for inbound
>> resolution and reconciliation.  Aggressively pruning them just makes more
>> work for people, because they must resolve the identifier that they have in
>> hand to its canonical form (probably by hitting the issuing authority)
>> before using it for Wikidata lookups.
>>
>> What do others think?
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Addshore
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to