On 11/12/2015 09:10 AM, Markus Krötzsch wrote: [...] > On the other hand, it is entirely possible to implement correct OWL QL (note: > *QL* not *RL*) reasoning in SPARQL without even using "rules" that need any > recursive evaluation [3]. This covers all of RDFS, and indeed some of the > patterns in these queries are quite well-known to Wikidata users too (e.g., > using "subclassOf*" in a query). Depending on how much of OWL QL you want to > support, the SPARQL queries you get in this case are more or less simple. This > work also gives arguments as to why this style of SPARQL-based implementation > does (most likely) not exist for OWL RL [3].
Does OWL QL cover *all* of RDFS, even things like subproperties of rdfs:subclassOf and rdfs:subPropertyOf? peter _______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
