It should show "New item" instead of "Not on Wikidata" where it works. You may have to force-reload mix'n'match once to get the new version.
Note that it will still say "Not on Wikidata", without item creation, for catalogs that do not have a Wikidata property. On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:47 PM Andrew Gray <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dario, > > Looks like it's working now. Try clicking "remove match" on the "not > in Wikidata" DBI item - it should now offer a link to create a new > item rather than mark it as not-on-Wikidata. > > I've just done it with one of the Dictionary of Ulster Biography > items, and it produces this stub ready for fleshing out - > > https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q21540032&oldid=276086447 > > Andrew. > > On 24 November 2015 at 04:50, Dario Taraborelli > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Magnus, is the change live yet? I unmatched Giuseppe Civran (Q3770329) > and > > Giuseppe Civran (DBI) and flagged the latter as “Not on Wikidata”, but no > > new item was created. > > > > I am starting from this view of Mix’n’Match: > > > https://tools.wmflabs.org/mix-n-match/?mode=catalog&catalog=55&offset=0&show_noq=0&show_autoq=1&show_userq=0&show_na=0#the_start > > > > On Nov 23, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Magnus Manske <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > Done. > > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:25 PM Asaf Bartov <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Dario Taraborelli > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Nov 21, 2015, at 10:31, Magnus Manske <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> A soultion could be to change the "not on Wikidata" button (or link) > to a > >>> "create new item" button. The new item would have a label, a > description > >>> (maybe), a statement with the catalog ID (if there is an associated > WIkidata > >>> property!), and "instance of:human" if the entry is internally marked > as > >>> "person", but nothing else. > >>> > >>> > >>> Would that be welcomed by "mix'n'matchers", and Wikidata people? I > think > >>> it would make sense, for catalogs with a Wikidata property at least. > >>> > >>> > >>> I would strongly support this, with the restrictions you suggest. > >> > >> > >> +1. This would be good. > >> > >> A. > >> > >> -- > >> Asaf Bartov > >> Wikimedia Foundation > >> > >> Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in > the > >> sum of all knowledge. Help us make it a reality! > >> https://donate.wikimedia.org > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wikidata mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikidata mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > > > > > > > > Dario Taraborelli Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation > > wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wikidata mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > > > > > -- > - Andrew Gray > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
