What are the thoughts on URI's? Should they be considered as Identifiers as
well? If so, equivalance class (P1709) should be considered as well.
However, that caters values with datatype URL.
We are currently considering using this property to map to various equal
classes. (e.g.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q35869 wdtP1709:
* <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/DOID_2841>
* <http://identifiers.org/doid/DOID:2841>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Jane Darnell <[email protected]> wrote:
> I had the same question. Since these are generally just library
> references, I assumed something like having them move to the bottom of the
> page in the Wikidata item browser, so that people don't need to scroll
> through long lists of machine-readable numerical references to get the gist
> of "who what where when" info of an item.
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Magnus Manske <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 9:00 PM Lydia Pintscher <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> (For the technically inclined: The datatype will change for these
>>> properties but the value type will stay string.)
>>>
>>
>> So, what exactly will the datatype change to?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikidata mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
