Hi Luca,
Op 5-3-2016 om 16:45 schreef Luca Martinelli:
Point taken, I apologise for using too dramatic tones.
Looks like more people are eager to get this over with and can't wait to
get everything converted
Nonetheless, I stick to the point that probably a ">99% unique
identifier" threshold is too high. Just to make another example
(disclaimer: I asked for this property since it is yet another
catalogue that my institution runs), P1949 has not been converted to
identifier because it has "only 98.82% unique out of 507 uses", that
translates in only *six* cases out of 505 items which have two P1949
identifiers.
That's correct. As I said in my previous email: We're first doing the
easy properties. You can see the easy properties at
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:ArthurPSmith/Identifiers/1 . The easy
ones are the ones that have 99%+ single value and 99%+ unique. Compare
that with https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Addshore/Identifiers/1 and
you'll notice we still have loads of easy ones we have to process (the
unchecked list is still quite long).
Once we get those out of the way, we'll get to the more difficult ones.
I prefer quality over speed here. I don't expect any problems with
converting P1949.
Maarten
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
