@tom thanks for the connexion!

@ruben interesting! will read the full paper asap :)

@ruben @stas I'm not very familiar with Linked Data Fragments, so any
additional links to get a better understanding of how this could help
address this usecase is welcome!

Maxime

Le 28/04/2016 23:00, Stas Malyshev a écrit :
> Hi!
>
>> feature that needs to be snappy. So the alternative approach I have been
>> working on to is to get a subset of a Wikidata dump and put it in an
>> ElasticSearch instance.
> The linked data fragments implementation would probably be useful for
> that, and I think it would be good idea to get one eventually for the
> Wikidata Query Service, but not yet. Also, we do have ElasticSearch
> index for Wikidata (that's what drives search on site) so it would be
> possible to integrate it with Query Service too (there's some support
> for it in Blazegraph) but it's still not done. So for now I think we
> don't have a ready-made solution yet. You could still try to
> prefix-search or regex-search on the query service, but depending on the
> query it may be too slow right now.
>
>> *Question:
>> *What is the best way to get all the entities matching a given claim?
>> My answer so far was downloading a dump, then filtering the entities by
>> claim,  but are there better/less resource-intensive ways?
> Probably not currently without some outside tools. When we get LDF
> support, then that may be the way :)
>


_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to