On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:25 PM Neubert, Joachim <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Magnus, Osma, > > > > I suppose the scenario Osma pointed out is quite common for knowledge > organization systems and in particular thesauri: Matching could take > advantage of multilingual labels and also of synonyms, which are defined in > the KOS. > > > > For the populating STW Thesaurus for Economics ID (P3911), my preliminary > plan was to match with all multilingual labels and synonyms as search > string in a custom WD endpoint (Fuseki, with full text search support), and > display in the ranked SPARQL results of the search with a column with a > valid insert statement that can be copied and pasted into QuickStatements2. > > > > Since Stas just announced an extension for WDQS with fulltext search (if I > haven’t misunderstood his mail of 2017-06-12), it is perhaps now possible > to do this kind of matching in WDQS. > > > > It would be great if such an extended matching could be integrated into > M’n’m. > To clarify, Mix'n'match already searches language-neutral, e.g. for automatch. Storing multiple labels per entry in the Mix'n'match database, and then checking all-against-all, would require some large-scale rewiring.
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
