Hi Osma,

The instrument we used to avoid duplicates was Mix-n-match. Even when something 
is not "automatically matched", often, on the details page (e.g., 
https://tools.wmflabs.org/mix-n-match/#/entry/22734337), possible matches come 
up.

That covers the case where a (partial) name is present somewhere in Wikidata or 
Wikipedia. Unfortunatly, I've not yet figured out how I could feed my own 
synonyms into Mix-n-match. Providing them in the description field helps for 
intellectual identification, but seems not to be used by the matching 
algorithm. Possibly, a separate "catalog" with permutated name variants from 
not-yet-matched entries could help, but I'm not sure if Magnus would encourage 
that, because it messes up the catalog list. Swedish and Finnish names for the 
same locations however could perhaps be a valid use case.

Anyway, with the 2,200 missing RePEc authors I decided at that point that the 
result was good enough, and created the not-matched entries. Less than a 
handful showed up later on as duplicates at some point (e.g., as automatically 
matched against GND). Of course, some will still linger hidden. But it is very 
easy to merge items in Wikidata, so I consider that as a much minor problem 
than it would be in library systems, where it is administrative and technically 
much more difficult to get rid of duplicates. 

Cheers, Joachim (and sorry for the late response)

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Wikidata [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von
> Osma Suominen
> Gesendet: Montag, 21. August 2017 13:41
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [Wikidata] Some Mix'n'match mappings not stored in Wikidata?
> 
> Hi Joachim,
> 
> Thanks for this, indeed this could be a potential strategy for us to add some 
> or
> all of the missing entities. The challenge is that we would need to be
> reasonably sure that the places we want to create actually don't exist in
> Wikidata, for example using an alternate spelling. You said in your question
> that "Of course we make sure that neither of the ids exist in WD so far", but
> how did you do that?
> 
> -Osma
> 
> Neubert, Joachim kirjoitti 21.08.2017 klo 12:36:
> > Hi Osma,
> >
> > re. adding missing items, I've made good experiences with creating
> > input files for Quickstatements2 (see
> > https://github.com/zbw/repec-ras/blob/master/bin/create_missing_wikida
> > ta.pl). I've discussed how to best do this in the Wikidata Project
> > Chat before, and received valuable advice.
> > (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat/Archive/2017/05#S
> > ource_statements_for_items_syntesized_from_authorities_-_recommendatio
> > ns.3F)
> >
> > Feel free to ask for further information, and all the best, Joachim
> >
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: Wikidata [mailto:[email protected]] Im
> >> Auftrag von Osma Suominen
> >> Gesendet: Montag, 21. August 2017 11:07
> >> An: Discussion list for the Wikidata project.
> >> Betreff: [Wikidata] Some Mix'n'match mappings not stored in Wikidata?
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We're more than halfway through mapping YSO places to Wikidata. Most
> >> of the remaining are places that don't exist in Wikidata, and adding
> >> them is quite labor-intensive so we will have to consider our strategy.
> >>
> >> Anyway, I did some checking of what remains unmapped and noticed a
> >> potential problem: some mappings for places that we have mapped using
> >> Mix'n'match have not actually been stored in Wikidata. For example
> >> Q36 Poland ("Puola" in YSO Places) is such a case. In Mix'n'match it
> >> is shown as manually matched (see attached screenshot), but in
> >> Wikidata the corresponding YSO ID property doesn't actually exist for
> >> the entity. I checked the change history of the Q36 entity and
> >> couldn't find anything relevant there, so it seems that the mapping
> >> was never stored in Wikidata. Maybe there was a transient error of some
> kind?
> >>
> >> Another such case was Q1754 Stockholm ("Tukholma" in YSO places). But
> >> for that one we removed the existing mapping in Mix'n'match and set
> >> it again, and now it is properly stored in Wikidata.
> >>
> >> Mix'n'match currently reports 4228 mappings for YSO places, while a
> >> SPARQL query for the Wikidata endpoint returns 4221 such mappings. So
> >> I suspect that this only affects a small number of entities.
> >>
> >> Is it possible to compare the Mix'n'match mappings with what actually
> >> exists in Wikidata, and somehow re-sync them? Or just to get the
> >> mappings out from Mix'n'match and compare them with what exists in
> >> Wikidata, so that the few missing mappings may be added there manually?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Osma
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Osma Suominen
> >> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist National Library of
> >> Finland P.O. Box
> >> 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
> >> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
> >> Tel. +358 50 3199529
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.nationallibrary.fi
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wikidata mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Osma Suominen
> D.Sc. (Tech), Information Systems Specialist National Library of Finland P.O. 
> Box
> 26 (Kaikukatu 4)
> 00014 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO
> Tel. +358 50 3199529
> [email protected]
> http://www.nationallibrary.fi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata

Reply via email to