I would certainly support this proposal or can even propose it. Would it also be an idea to do the narrow equivalent, at the same time? Any objection to naming them broad and narrow match, to reflect the mapping relations in SKOS?
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:54 AM Thad Guidry <thadgui...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, Dan > > aggregate demand <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1801078> -- broader > external class --> https://schema.org/Demand > > place of devotion <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P5873> -- > broader external class --> https://schema.org/Place > > festival <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q132241> -- broader external > class --> https://schema.org/Event > > Usually we can discover these relationships quite easily with "What links > here" on the GUI and applicable SPARQL queries, but then would like to > apply the Wikidata->Schema.org mappings when we discover those > relationships can be made. I suck at PHP, so I couldn't build or > contribute to a native application for Wikidata to host that application to > auto discover some of these mappings, but would be happy to assist someone > who could code in PHP to build such application...here's looking at you, > Magnus ? :-) > > -Thad > +ThadGuidry <https://plus.google.com/+ThadGuidry> > > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 7:07 PM Dan Brickley <dan...@google.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 16:35, Thad Guidry <thadgui...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Team ! >>> +Dan Brickley <dan...@google.com> +Lydia Pintscher >>> <lydia.pintsc...@wikimedia.de> >>> >>> Schema.org mapping is progressing on every new Weekly Summary "Newest >>> properties" listing. >>> That's great ! And thanks to Léa and team for providing the new >>> properties listing ! >>> >>> What's not great, is many times, we cannot apply a "broader external >>> class" to map to a Schema.org Type. This is because "broader concept" >>> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P4900 is constrained to >>> "qualifiers only and not for use on statements". >>> >>> We are able to use the existing "narrower external class" >>> <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P3950> , for example like here >>> on this topic, https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7406919 , but there is no >>> "broader external class" property in Wikidata yet from what we see. >>> >>> It would be *awesome* if someone could advocate for that new property >>> to help map Wikidata to external vocabularies that have broader concepts >>> quite often, such as Schema.org. >>> >> >> Could you give 2-3 specific examples, to help motivate the request, for >> folk who're not tracking this work? >> >> Dan >> >> -Thad >>> +ThadGuidry <https://plus.google.com/+ThadGuidry> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
