Ah, thanks, Luke. I thought it was constrained to only the main entity and not just any claims from a Wikipedia page. But it seems that the description is pretty clear there ...
Describes claims imported from Wikimedia projects like Wikipedia, either by > bots or manually. For other sources, use "stated in" (P248) (English) > Thad https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/ On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 6:56 PM Lucas Werkmeister <[email protected]> wrote: > I’ve added a second reference with, as far as I know, the preferred way to > model this: “imported from Wikimedia project” + “Wikimedia import URL” (via > the “permanent link” in the sidebar on the Wikipedia article). I’m not sure > if a “retrieved” date should also be added. > > Cheers, > Lucas > On 06.03.19 01:45, Thad Guidry wrote: > > How are folks commonly giving references back to Wikipedia page mentions? > > My use case seems to be causing a constraint violation and I'd like to > know how to better handle that reference case. > > https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q61976849 > > Thanks in advance! > Thad > https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/ > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing > [email protected]https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
