Hoi,
What is it that you hope to achieve by this.. It will add to the time it
takes to process an edit. It is a luxury we cannot afford. It is also not
something that would influence my edits.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 at 13:55, Uwe Jung <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As the importance of Wikidata increases, so do the demands on the quality
> of the data. I would like to put the following proposal up for discussion.
>
> Two basic ideas:
>
> 1. Each Wikidata page (item) is scored after each editing. This score
> should express different dimensions of data quality in a quickly manageable
> way.
> 2. A property is created via which the item refers to the score value.
> Certain qualifiers can be used for a more detailed description (e.g. time
> of calculation, algorithm used to calculate the score value, etc.).
>
>
> The score value can be calculated either within Wikibase after each data
> change or "externally" by a bot. For the calculation can be used among
> other things: Number of constraints, completeness of references, degree of
> completeness in relation to the underlying ontology, etc. There are already
> some interesting discussions on the question of data quality which can be
> used here ( see https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Item_quality;
> https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Data_Quality, etc).
>
> Advantages
>
> - Users get a quick overview of the quality of a page (item).
> - SPARQL can be used to query only those items that meet a certain
> quality level.
> - The idea would probably be relatively easy to implement.
>
>
> Disadvantage:
>
> - In a way, the data model is abused by generating statements that no
> longer describe the item itself, but make statements about the
> representation of this item in Wikidata.
> - Additional computing power must be provided for the regular
> calculation of all changed items.
> - Only the quality of pages is referred to. If it is insufficient, the
> changes still have to be made manually.
>
>
> I would now be interested in the following:
>
> 1. Is this idea suitable to effectively help solve existing quality
> problems?
> 2. Which quality dimensions should the score value represent?
> 3. Which quality dimension can be calculated with reasonable effort?
> 4. How to calculate and represent them?
> 5. Which is the most suitable way to further discuss and implement
> this idea?
>
>
> Many thanks in advance.
>
> Uwe Jung (UJung <https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:UJung>)
> www.archivfuehrer-kolonialzeit.de/thesaurus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikidata mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
