Why not flip the question around and instead find a better predicate using the fantastic Wikidata Property Explorer <https://tools.wmflabs.org/prop-explorer/> and type in search tree for "award" and click the results in the tree ?
I found these that are useful: https://www.wikidata.org/entity/P166 https://www.wikidata.org/entity/P1027 https://www.wikidata.org/entity/P1411 Thad https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/ On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 2:34 PM Aidan Hogan <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey all, > > Andra recently mentioned about finding laureates in Wikidata, and it > reminded me that some weeks ago I was trying to come up with a SPARQL > query to find all Nobel Prize Winners in Wikidata. > > What I ended up with was: > > SELECT ?winner > WHERE { > ?winner wdt:P166 ?prize . > ?prize (wdt:P361|wdt:P31|wdt:P279) wd:Q7191 . > } > > > More specifically, looking into the data I found: > > Nobel Peace Prize (Q35637) > part of (P361) > Nobel Prize (Q7191) . > > Nobel Prize in Literature (Q37922) > subclass of (P279) > Nobel Prize (Q7191) . > > Nobel Prize in Economics (Q47170) > instance of (P31) > Nobel Prize (Q7191) ; > part of (P361) > Nobel Prize (Q7191) . > > Nobel Prize in Chemistry (Q44585) > instance of (P31) > Nobel Prize (Q7191) ; > part of (P361) > Nobel Prize (Q7191) . > > Nobel Prize in Physics (Q38104) > subclass of (P31) > Nobel Prize (Q7191) ; > part of (P361) > Nobel Prize (Q7191) . > > In summary, of the six types of Nobel prizes, three different properties > are used in five different combinations to state that they "are", in > fact, Nobel prizes. :) > > Now while it would be interesting to discuss the relative merits of P31 > vs. P279 vs. P361 vs. some combination thereof in this case and similar > such cases, I guess I am more interested in the general problem of the > lack of consensus that such a case exhibits. > > What processes (be they social, technical, or some combination thereof) > are currently in place to reach consensus in these cases in Wikidata? > > What could be put in place in future to highlight and reach consensus? > > Or is the idea more to leave the burden of "integrating" different > viewpoints to the consumer (e.g., to the person writing the query)? > > (Of course these are all "million dollar questions" that have been with > the Semantic Web since the beginning, but I am curious about what is > being done or can be done in the specific context of Wikidata to foster > consensus and reduce heterogeneity in such cases.) > > Best, > Aidan > > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata >
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
